Friday, February 25, 2011

Literary Essay for "The Painted Door" by Sinclair Ross

How do the characters all contribute to the circumstances in the story (adultery and death)? How did their choices affect the other Characters?

  • Ann's wishy washy attitude towards her marriage with John. This resulted in both adultery and indirectly, John's death.
  • John's possessive and obsessive attitude towards Ann resulted in her feeling "trapped" and "alienated," thus caused her to cheat.
  • John's loyalty to Ann brought him home, despite the storm. As a result, he froze to death.
  • Steven influenced Ann's decision to commit adultery, as he continuously said that John would not try to come home in the storm.
  • Steven's tendency towards taking care of his appearance encouraged Ann's disloyalty.

Topic: Who is responsible for John's death?
  • John: He decided to walk 5 miles when they know that there would be a storm. He left her alone with Steven and encouraged him to come over, telling them not to wait up for him.
  • John: For seven years, Ann has felt alienated in their marriage. John wouldn't socialize with her.
  • John: Refused to take care of his appearance, despite Ann's comments.
  • Ann: She's very judgmental of John and his appearance, therefore she slept with Steven and John left the house in the storm when he saw them.
  • Ann: Her weaknesses caused her to fall to the influence of her lust.
  • Ann: She knew that John would try to come home in the storm, but she had the affair anyways.
  • Steven: He convinced her that John was not going to come home.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Response - "Are governments closing the net around web freedom?" By Alex Hudson


This article gave insight in to the general idea of what was happening in Egypt and how it relates to the current arguments about internet censorship. Hudson gave his own opinion on the subject, while adding in the ideas of other significant members of society. I felt that the subject itself was an interesting one and it touched on ideas that I had little knowledge of. After reading the article, I am more aware of the arguments regarding internet restriction and I find it shocking how imperative the internet has become to modern day life. I think that it is unacceptable for the government to restrict use of the internet. The web was created as an unlimited device for research and communication. Blocking certain sections of the web violates the basic rights of freedom of speech and education.

Online Summary - "Are governments closing the net around web freedom?" By Alex Hudson

In the article, "Are governments closing the net around web freedom?" journalist Alex Hudson expresses the relevance of the internet in response to the uprising in Egypt. "Cutting off nearly all internet traffic for five days created a backlash, not only from the people of Egypt but from the usually apolitical companies Google and Twitter." says Hudson. Al Gore speaks on the issue of web freedom. "Defend the internet. Do not let it be controlled by governments or by large corporations. It is a network of people." Hudson suggests that there are still signs that the web is becoming dominated by these few large corporations. Inevitably, government agencies will be active online participants in order to enforce laws relating to public life. Tim Berners-Lee, creator of the world-wide web, is concerned that the involvement of government agencies and corporate officials in the interaction between persons on the internet is endangering basic human rights.

Hudson reveals that the internet is gradually changing with the introduction of “apps.” While simpler to use, apps are more easily monitored by the creator. Egypt is not the only country that has censored the internet. A large portion of the Americas and Europe has, in place, some sort of suppression, as disclosed by the think-tank “Reporters Without Borders.” According to Hudson, the United States Government has considered implicating an “internet kill-switch” to use in an absolute emergency and to cause the least amount of disturbance. Officially, the “internet kill-switch” is known as the “Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act” and would give the president the endowment to shut down areas of the internet at his own consciousness. Hudson presumes, by proof of recent examples, that discontinuing parts of the web is one of the first methods governments will use to “stifle protest.”

Monday, February 14, 2011

Response - PuSh Is So Good, Why Pretend Journalistic Objectivity? by Charles Campbell

Before reading Charles Campbell's article about the PuSh festival, I had no idea this event existed. Campbell wrote a very informative review of the festival and gave light to the benefits that PuSh brings to Vancouver's performance scene. I find it exciting how well the festival promotes Vancouver's community arts and theater industry and gathers audience members as well as acts from around the world. I would like to have learned a little bit more about the festival itself and how to become involved. The article explained why it was so important, but little about what it was. PuSh is definitely something I would like to research more and possibly have the chance to attend. It seems like a place to showcase the talent of Vancouverites that are forced beneath the radar by more mainstream entertainment.

http://thetyee.ca/ArtsAndCulture/2011/02/02/PushSoGood/

Online Summary - Due February 15th

Step 1: Open the attached file and read the article and short videos. Write a Summary of the story, checking your notes to make sure you remember all the ticky rules. Remember, the length of most summaries is about one quarter the length of the original piece.

Step 2: Write a Personal Response to the story.

Step 3: Create a group of 3 to 4 people. Read each other's summaries. If
you see an error, tell the writer to correct it (gracefully). Record the names of the readers at the bottom of your summary.

Step 4: Taking turns, read your Responses out loud. Discuss.

Step 6: Send your Summary (not your response) to me through Edmodo. Remember to type in your class code and not my name. (C-Block: 335y5p) (D-Block: mfdj0k) Copy and paste the assignment; do not use an attachment.

Marking Criteria:

Technical rules of summary followed: /4

Word choice, grammar, sophistication /4
of language:

Main ideas of summary evident: insignificant /4
details left out:

/12

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/9386720.stm



Friday, February 11, 2011

ted.com

Choose 10 videos that you are interested in watching and record each of the following for each video:

1) Name of the presenter
2) Title of presentation
3) Topic
4) Go to the "about this talk" section. Paraphrase what it says
5) Go to the "About this presenter" and take a few biographical notes on the presenter
6) What point/thesis does the presenter have?
7) Why are you excited about this particular TED talk?
8) How has the presenter changed the way you view the topic?
9) What is the one image you will take away from this talk?
10) Choose one single word that best describes this talk


TED Talks
Liza Donnelly: Drawing upon humor for change
1)      Women’s rights, female empowerment, and the stereotypes of modern life.
2)      Liz Donnelly, a cartoonist out of New York, uses her drawings to show how humor can empower women to step up against modern standards.
3)      Donnelly joined The New Yorker in 1982 as the youngest cartoonist, and one of only three female employees. In 2005, Donnelly wrote the definitive book about her colleagues: Funny Ladies: The New Yorker’s Greatest Women Cartoonists and Their Cartoons. She has been involved in other books as well, including Sex and Sensibility and  Cartoon Marriage (about her life with fellow New Yorker cartoonist Michael Maslin). She is also known for a popular series of Dinosaur children’s books. In 2007, Donnelly joined the United Nations initiative Cartooning for Peace with which, she travels around the world to speak out about freedom of speech and other global problems. She is a founding member of the Cartoonists Association, a contributor to dscriber.com as the editor of World Ink, and she teaches women’s studies at Vassar.
4)      Donnelly wants to convince the public of the ridiculousness of today’s standards for females, and to empower these women to use this humor to their advantage.
5)      This particular TED talk uses an age-old argument in a humorous way. It is something that would be enjoyable for both men and women to watch, while pressing ideas that work to the advantage of today’s females. Donnelly’s cartoons are relatable and true. That is was people are interested in. She isn’t bombarding her audience with stuffy statistics or cynical conclusions about the plausible end of the world, she is giving light to the idea that women don’t have to be what they are expected to be. It’s funny.
6)      I think this is something that a lot of girls my age would find interesting and useful. Donnelly shows that making change doesn’t always have to involve being unpleasant, whiny, and verbally violent. It is small initiatives like this that can spark a change in society’s views.
7)       Aside from her drawings themselves, Donnelly has a lot of really intellectual points about the issue. The things that she said compliment the topic and she was a very eloquent speaker. She was easy to listen to and that made watching the video that much more enjoyable.
8)      Innovative








Chris Jordan pictures some shocking stats

1)    Consumerism, our impact on the environment, and the shocking statistics of every day product use. “The behaviors we all engage in unconsciously.”
2)    Photographer Chris Jordan uses his artwork to create a visual representation of some shocking numbers, showing us a view of what Western culture really looks like.
3)    Chris Jordan focuses his work on Western consumption, making impossible numbers visible to humans. His 2003-05 series “intolerable Beauty” examines the hypnotic allure of the sheer amount of stuff we make and consume every day. His latest series, “Running the Numbers,” gives life to the statistics of US consumption. In April 2008, Jordan traveled around the world with National Geographic as an international eco-ambassador for Earth Day 2008.
4)    "As you walk up close, you can see that the collective is only made up of lots and lots of individuals. There is no bad consumer over there somewhere who needs to be educated. There is no public out there who needs to change. It's each one of us."-Chris Jordan on Bill Moyers Journal. Jordan wants to use something aesthetically pleasing to convince people of their individual impact on the numbers.
5)    Jordan uses art in an effective way. He is using his passion to communicate ideas to the public and making something so abstract, these large numbers, comprehensible for the average person. They are pieces that people will enjoy looking at and learning about, as well as being shocking and exhilarating.
6)    Jordan makes statistics like these visual to all people. Numbers are hard to understand when they are so large but Jordan presents them in a way that makes them easier to understand. Some of these numbers I was unaware of. It is absolutely shocking to know something like how many plastic cups are used on US airlines every hour, or the number of teenagers who will start smoking this month. He makes is visual. He makes it something you can feel.
7)    Jordan showed a photograph of millions of cigarette boxes that, when zoomed out, creates the painting “Skull With Cigarette” by Van Gough. This was a particularly interesting piece because it made such a beautiful work of art something so ugly.
8)    Shocking







Sarah Kay: If I should have a daughter...

<!--[if !supportLists]-->1)    <!--[endif]-->Spoken word poet, Sarah Kay, tells the story of her journey from curious teenager to accomplished teacher and speaker.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->2)    <!--[endif]-->Kay gives two performances of her pieces “B” and “Hiroshima” and talks of her metamorphosis from an inquisitive teen to a teacher connecting today’s kids with the power of expression through poetry.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->3)    <!--[endif]-->As a high school freshman, Kay took a liking to spoken word poetry and would spend nights studying the work of New York’s most exciting poets in the famous Bowery Poetry Club. She was given the chance to take its stage at a young age and this opportunity sparked a bright future for Kay. Now 22, Kay co-directs Project V.O.I.C.E. (Vocal Outreach Into Creative Expression) Founded by Kay in 2004, V.O.I.C.E. encourages expression through spoken word poetry, particularly in teens.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->4)    <!--[endif]-->Kay expresses the power of poetry in words in helping people, particularly today’s youth, make sense of the world itself. She states that she writes poetry to understand things. Through her writing she finds a solution, and when she doesn’t, she still has a new poem. Kay wants to encourage her students to write about not only what they know, but what they don’t understand.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->5)    <!--[endif]-->Kay is a very effective speaker. She is confident and funny and she tells her story in an interesting way. I think her mission is very innovative and she is giving a creative outlet to people who otherwise may not have one. She is an interesting person to listen to and her story is inspiring.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->6)    <!--[endif]-->I have always found interest in spoken word poetry. It is something that I find entertaining to listen to and an easy way to express what I’m thinking. Her poems are so easy to listen to and appealing and she makes me want to continue writing, even if only for myself.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->7)    <!--[endif]-->Kay mentioned a tall girl in a hoodie a few times. When she was a high school student she presented one of her poems in front of an audience of her peers. A girl later approached her and told her how the poem had touched her. I think that is one of the most amazing reactions one can have from an audience. When one’s art reaches someone, even one person, and they are touched enough to say something about it, it is more rewarding that any award or shallow compliment.  
<!--[if !supportLists]-->8)    <!--[endif]-->Charismatic

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Writing A Response

  • A response to an article is your own personal opinion about the content of the piece. You can use "I think" and "I believe" in a response. There are no right or wrong answers. You can agree or disagree with the writer. Try some of these questions of you are stuck:
a)What did you know about the topic?
b)What did you learn about the topic?
c)What else do you want to know about the topic?
d)How does this knowledge connect to your life?
e)How has this knowledge changed how you think?
f)How has this knowledge change dhow you will act?
g)Would you recommend this article? Why or why not?
h)What connections can you make to connect your life to this article?

Writing A Summary

  • Start with a sentence naming the writer and the article title and stating the essay's main idea. Then write your summary, omitting nothing important and avoiding unimportant details. Strive for overall coherence through appropriate transitions. Put the title of the article in quotation marks.
  • Be concise in order to compress your ideas. Focus on the most important general ideas put forth by the writers and leave out the supporting details.
  • Refer to the writer of the article throughout your summary. Ex. John Brown believes that poverty in Canada is caused by unemployment.
  • Never include you own opinions in a summary.
  • Conclude with a final statement reflecting the significance of the article - not from your own point of view, but from the writer's. 

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Summary - PuSh Is So Good, Why Pretend Journalistic Objectivity? by Charles Campbell

Journalist, Charles Cambell, delves in to the significance of the artistic community in his article "PuSh is So Good, Why Pretend Journalistic Objectivity?" The seven-year-old PuSh International Performing Arts festival is an intriguing and thought provoking set of short performance pieces expressing a lot about Vancouver as a city. "La Marea, a set of nine 10-minute performance pieces, promised intimacy with the inner thoughts of its characters," states Campbell. Reviews on La Marea were mixed but several thousand people came to witness it, regardless. Campbell feels that "Cozy Vancouver" could use a little more of the kind of risk-taking that dares failure but strives to test boundaries. This year the festival is the first major event to mark the 125th anniversary of Vancouver as a city. The past 25 years have been comprised of an outburst of new theater companies, exploding with talent but lacking an audience. PuSh brings theater presenters to Vancouver from all around the world. "PuSh may, in fact, be the city's most collaborative festival. Its executive director, Norman Armour, understands that if we're going to build something that matters and lasts, we must do it together." Says Campbell. The PuSh Festival gives light to the theater's potential for invention, and provides theater with a clear sense of place.

http://thetyee.ca/ArtsAndCulture/2011/02/02/PushSoGood/

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Summary


What are the differences among quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing?

Quoting matches the original author’s work exactly. There are no differences whatsoever.  Must be attributed to the original author.

Paraphrasing involves putting a passage from source material into your own words. Must be attributed to the author. Condensed version of a broader segment of the source material.

Summarizing Involves putting the main ideas in to your own words, including only the main ideas. Attribute the summarized ideas to the original source. Significantly shorter than the original.

Why use quotations, paraphrases, and summaries?


·      Add credibility and provide support for claims.
·      Give examples of several points of view on the subject.
·      Call attention to a certain position you wish to agree or disagree with.
·      Highlight a particularly striking phrase in the original text.
·      Distance yourself from the original work. Show that it is not your own.
·      Expand the depth of your writing.

How to use quotations, paraphrases, and summaries.

Read the entire text, noting the key points and main ideas.
·      Summarize in your own words what the single main idea of the essay is.
·      Paraphrase important supporting points that come up in the essay.
·      Consider any words, phrases, or brief passages that you believe should be quoted directly.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Reflections

February 7th

"I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something. I will not refuse to do the something I can do." - Helen Keller

Everyone is born with some sort of gift or ability that will contribute to the world in some sort of way. This could be something small, like an honest heart, or something larger like the power to heal wounds with one touch. Regardless, we all have a function. The point is, no one person can do everything, but everyone can do something and that something gives you a purpose nonetheless. Keller is saying if you can do something, use it, go for it, and do it. Don't be a wimp about it because you were given a gift for a reason and no matter how futile you believe it is, it will make a difference in some way. Helen Keller seems proud that, despite her disabilities, she was able to make an impact and use the talents that she did have. Lacking sight or the ability to hear and speak didn't determine whether she would become successful or not. Her determination to overcome those obstacles and find something that was truly meant for her was what molded her future. She may have only been one person, just as I am and you are and whoever else might be reading this is, but she was still a person.

February 16th

"Survival, I know, is to begin again." - Judy Collins

I think what Collins is trying to say, is that the definition of surviving is knowing how to restart after a tragedy. This is very true in that in order to "survive" one must begin again, making positive out of the negative. To survive something, is to come out of that something looking past the misfortune and towards the solution. This statement is very abrupt and straight to the point. She is saying what she wants to say without shadowing the meaning behind metaphors.

When words fail me...

I remain silent, for fear of slipping up and saying something inappropriate. When words fail me, I avoid the eyes of expecting peers. When words fail me, I hide. When words fail me, though this happens rarely, I prefer to be alone because I won't tolerate not being able to share my views. When words really fail me, when I am at a complete loss, when I have reached my emotional limit, I dance. 

"When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion." - CP Snow

 I think that this statement is brilliant in so many ways.  It is true that the most terrible crimes have been committed by unwillingly ferocious people who are under the influence of the power of another. Crimes committed for the sake of rebellion are executed with the idea of change in mind. The idea that the person is doing something for the greater good, or even for the smallest change. Those who commit acts of terror based on the ideals of another person, those who act out on the precedent that they are "supposed to" or they "have to or else" are not basing their acts on a strong belief of their own, but rather on that of another person. These crimes are often unforgivable, using the Holocaust as an example. Many of the events that took place during the Holocaust were initiated by followers of the NAZI party. These followers were convinced by the NAZI initiative, that it was the "right" thing to do, to trust the power of Hitler and his army. These acts were rarely committed out of a true, personal hatred for non-German people.

February 17th 


The road to authenticity. 
by Brené Brown, Ph.D., LMSW 

The Cruelty Crisis: Bullying Isn't a School Problem, It's a National Pastime

Exclusion, humiliation, gossiping, name-calling, and cutthroat alliances - we can't get enough! We panic when these behaviors are directed at our own children and we express outrage when the consequences turn deadly, but over the past few years we, the adults, have turned cruelty into entertainment and sport.

According to the Nielsen ratings, reality television topped the "most watched TV" list in 2009 and analysts expect the trend to continue through 2010. From the Real Housewives of Orange County to the Jersey Shore, reality TV draws audiences by delivering performances that mirror the exact behaviors that we define as bullying. We tune in to watch hostile confrontations, belittling, collusion, backstabbing, and public ridicule. We're drawn in by the promise of mean-spiritedness and we're seduced by the idea that we get to watch people's most intimate and private moments made public. Sound painfully familiar?

Gossiping, one of the most glamorized behaviors on TV and a popular weapon in the bully arsenal, is another behavior that falls into the "do as we say, not as we do" category. As adults, how many times have we stood around with a group of friends or colleagues and criticized or made fun of someone? It happens every day in carpool lines, in the back of churches, in front yards, and around the water cooler. We wonder why the awkward first grader is being excluded from birthday parties when our PTO clique is constantly whispering about his weird mother and would never consider inviting her to coffee.

When it comes to managing conflict and difference, we're not exactly modeling the behaviors that we want to see in our children. Whether it's politics,religion, or social issues, the more uncertain we feel, the more certain we act. Finger pointing, screaming, and in-your-face personal attacks have replaced respectful and necessary debate and discourse. We see this everywhere from political talk shows and school meetings, to the sidelines of kids' soccer games. I've heard people define bullying as "angry, aggressive acting out in children." I would argue that a lot of bullying is simply kids acting like aggressive parents acting out and behaving like angry children.

I've spent the past decade studying vulnerability, shame, authenticity, and belonging. I've interviewed research participants and collected thousands of stories about how we live, love, parent, work, and navigate our increasingly anxious world. Over the past ten years I've witnessed a profoundly dangerous pattern of behavior emerge in our culture:

As our fear, uncertainty, and feelings of vulnerability increase, cruelty becomes an acceptable way for us to discharge our pain and discomfort. Rather than doing the difficult work of embracing our own vulnerabilities and imperfections, we expose, attack, or ridicule what is vulnerable and imperfect about others.

In our culture, vulnerability is synonymous with weakness, and imperfect means inadequate. Rather than acknowledging that we are all vulnerable and imperfect, we buy into the painful idea that we are less than; that we aren't worthy of belonging. It is the struggle for worthiness and belonging that leads to bullying.

Belonging is the innate human need to be a part of something larger than us; we are hardwired for it. Cruelty is a predictable outcome in a culture that tells us that invulnerability and perfection are prerequisites for belonging. We are never more dangerous than when we are backed into a corner of never __________ enough (good/ rich/ thin /successful/ admired/ certain/ extraordinary/ safe/ in control/ powerful/ etc.).

In a world that is plagued by war, economic hardship, and pervasive self-doubt, we rage and humiliate to alleviate our own misery. It's simply easier to attack and berate others or watch it happen on TV, than it is to risk having honest conversations about our struggles with worthiness. Why lean into our own feelings of scarcity and shame, when we can watch strangers get booed off stage or voted off the island? It feels good to watch others suffer.

If we want to reclaim courage and compassion in our families, schools, organizations, and communities, we must open our hearts and minds to a new way of thinking about vulnerability and imperfection. Our imperfections are not flaws; they are what connect us to each other and to our humanity. Vulnerability may be at the core of fear and uncertainty, but it is also the birthplace of courage and compassion - exactly what we need to help us stop lashing out and start engaging with the world from a place of worthiness; a place where empathy and kindness matter.

Whether we are a sweaty-palmed 7th grader navigating a hostile cafeteria, or a laid-off worker trying to make a mortgage payment, or a young mother waiting for mammogram results, feeling vulnerable, imperfect and afraid is human. It is when we lose our capacity to hold space for these struggles that we become dangerous. We can legislate behavior all day long, but true compassion comes from a tender and vulnerable place where we understand how inextricably connected we are.

Courage and compassion are not ideals; they are daily practices. The TV shows that we allow in our homes, the way we discuss politics and social issues, the way we handle altercations at the grocery story - these are choices with real consequences. Bullying is a serious problem in schools, but we are all accountable for the cruelty crisis that is fueling these behaviors. The answer to the bullying problem starts with this question: Do we have the courage to be the adults that our children need us to be?

  1. Humiliation 
  2. Outrage
  3. Confrontation
  4. Hostile
  5. Ridicule
  6. Vulnerability
  7. Cruelty
  8. Imperfect
  9. Compassion
  10. Altercations

RESPONSE

"Confrontation. Depending on your adversary, it's not always a good idea." Standing up for oneself, proving one's capability, being tough. When the instinct of the human mind takes over and our natural defense mechanisms kick in, we become slaves to our insecurities. We put up walls of our own, concrete barriers that hold strong against any nuclear weapon, but can be cracked by the most insignificant comment. Words that hit home, words that weasel in to our deepest subconscious and hurt more than any stick or stone. In an attempt to prove our stability we create conflict. It is easiest to fight back. Although many people feel that confrontation is pointless and that fighting back will get you no where, one's actions do not always reflect one's opinion. Confrontation derives from the inner most need to defend oneself. It latches on to one's weaknesses and as soon as those tiny imperfections are threatened, it attacks. Confrontation comes from needing to be right, needing to be heard and seen. It comes from having to proves oneself, no matter the opponent. 

http://www.edarticle.com/character-education/bullying/how-to-help-you-child-to-deal-with-bullying-part-1.html


February 21st

Why do you think people engage in immoral acts? Why do I engage in immoral acts?

In the modern world, the border between 'right' and 'wrong' has weakened and become thin. So many kids now a days are accidentally implanted with the idea that they can get away with almost anything and, in turn, act upon these rule-breaking activities in an attempt to prove their power. There is an ever increasing movement when it comes to the concept of 'age equality.' Adolescents feel that they have the right to question authority and do whatever they please. The absolute opposite could also be considered a catalyst for impromptu behavior. 

February 22nd 

Evil. What makes people go wrong?


"The world is, was, and will always be filled with evil."

Where there is good there will be bad.
Evil is about power.
What is responsible. 


Dispositional 
Situational
Systematic


"All evil starts with 15 volts."


"The pornography of power."

  • Mindlessly taking the  first small step
  • Dehumanization of others
  • De-individualization of self (anonimity)
  • Diffusion of personal responsibility
  • Blind obedience to authority
  • Uncritical conformity to group norms
  • Passive tolerance of evil through inaction or indifference 
"The line between good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being."  - Alexandre Solzenitsyn

"The evil of inaction"


March 9th


Describe a time when you have been mistreated by another person. What would you say to that person?

A recent fall-out with a close friend of mine has got me thinking. What does it really mean to be a good friend to someone? What does it take to be someone's best friend? What actually defines a best friend? Honestly there is no specific event that I could even begin to describe that could justify the end of our relationship. It just stopped. It ended and I would like to think that we changed or grew apart but it seems that we were always the way we are now, we just realized that we never really liked each other. If I take a few steps back and really look in to the beginning of the friendship, there was nothing entirely appealing about her. She was ignorant and arrogant and she really didn't seem to care about anyone or anything but herself. Even when I got to know her. When she shared with me things about her life and her family she would talk to me as if she were some sort of higher power and I was blessed to be in her presence. She expected me to give her my full attention but I was a very small priority to her. So now I question why I ever felt that she would be a compatible friend. She never treated me as if I meant anything to her and if she did it was only because she needed something from me or she knew I was angry with her. So I have a few question for her...


Did you ever really know who I was? Do you realize how much of an impact you had by treating me the way you did? Are you really that selfish? Do you even care?


March 11th

I find the subject of selfishness incredibly finicky. Everyone has a different definition of selfishness based on how they act and how selfish they think one can be until it can be considered a bad thing. I think all acts that benefit oneself are "selfish" acts. The real question is, to what degree of selfish is it considered negative? Are you doing something for another person because you want to help, and the self satisfaction is just a bonus? Or are you doing something because you know it will make you look like a good person. We all just want to be good people. 


March 14th

Holocaust 


The Holocaust is a historic event, having taken place during the time of World War 11. Initiated by Adolf Hitler and the NAZI political party, the Holocaust itself spread across Germany and the concept of killing or harming Jewish people was a popular one. Hitler wanted to convince the people of Germany that the Jewish people were to blame for the countries economic downfall and societal issues. He used this standpoint in his race for leader of the country. Although Hitler is seen as an evil man, killing so many people with his own hands, it was his faithful followers who were either intrigued by his motives or afraid of disobeying him who did the dirty work. Jewish people were stripped of almost all of their basic rights. They were soon not allowed to work and rarely were able to own a business without the location being trashed by NAZI followers. Many Jewish members of society, if not in hidden well, were sent to concentration camps where they were sorted between women, children, and those unfit for work, and men that were able to work. These camps were filthy and the farthest thing from sanitary. Diseases spread like weeds and there was little food and water available. Eventually, as the number of people in these camps increased and the sicknesses spread, Jewish people were being loaded in to gas chambers and killed by gas poisoning.

-Are there still German people who feel this way about the Jewish race.
-How do the German people now feel about what happened during the Holocaust.
-How is the Holocaust taught in German schools?

April 13th 


The Importance of National Shame

I agree with Saunders' opinion on the subject. I think everyone should feel guilty for the crimes committed by their countries in the past because admitting to wrong doing is the ultimate form of humility. One can't consider oneself humble if one finds it difficult to accept one's own wrong-doing and thinking to highly of oneself or one's country can be dangerous. You can't go around and flaunt how wonderful your country is to the world because people will start to lose respect for you. They will start to see you and your country as arrogant and selfish and arrogance is quite different than confidence. It is perfectly acceptable to be confident in oneself or one's home but when that confidence turns in to arrogance, people become uncomfortable and this is when international problems emerge. 

April 13th 
It is common for "normal" society to look down upon people who are different. Drug addicts, for example, are seen as animals. They are seen as lazy, unmotivated and selfish. We, in a general use of the term, walk past these people on the streets and look away. We avoid the truth of the situation because it really does hurt. We are ashamed that there are people, right now, living on the streets of Vancouver and so we categorize them. They are different than us. I could never do that. I'm not like that. Hitler blamed the Jewish people for Germany's economic downfall. He, with the help of a large number of people, convinced a majority of the nation that the Jewish people were worthless. He categorized them. He made them different. Regardless of a person's race, religion, addiction, or mental health, they are people. They feel things and they understand things. They need to be given a chance. Yes, everyone has the capability to come out of a situation. But opportunity doesn't fall from the sky in to the hands of the needy. They need to be given an opportunity. People who have no where to go, no motivation, no self-respect. These are people who have been told, their whole lives, that they are worthless. They believe it. People who have been given an opportunity, an open door, are able to thrive in their potential.


May 9th

"He is much to be dreaded who stands in dread of poverty." - Publilius Syrus


Syrus might be trying to say that those who dread failure or 'poverty' are the most ambitious of all, constantly working to outrun fate and the inevitable. They tend to be the most powerful people. Often man is scared in to being strong and uses his fear to motivate him to do wondrous things. 


"There are questions of real power and then there are questions of phony authority. You have to break through the phony authority to begin to fight the real questions of power."  - Karen Nussbaum


I think this if of the most obvious statements about power. There is real power, pure ambition and god-given power. There is also a phony type of authority that is handed over by another human being who believes he holds power when, in reality, his power is none but the same type of phony authority. This reminds me of the type of power policemen and educational officials hold. There is no real power there. There is no influence or genuine practicality with that power. There is only a false sense of  authority over a seemingly inferior group of people and for that to be considered power is ridiculous. 


"The guilty think all talk is of themselves."  - Geoffrey Chaucer

A guilty person feels that everyone must being talking of their actions and what they have done. Cocky if you ask me, to be constantly thinking another person is talking about you. One should never assume another person is speaking of them, thinking of them, or looking at them. It's not classy, not lady-like, not gentlemanly. One must be humble, even when guilty. Guilty people who are suspicious are often caught sooner than those who are not.


FLAWS

- I trust people far too much and hold grudges when I get hurt.
- I can be socially awkward around people I want to impress.
- I care about a lot of people but fail to see when those people don't care back.
- I say often say things I don't mean and end up hurting people because of it.
- I tend to ignore people who I am angry with and avoid confronting them.
- I am submissive and will not hold my own ground when someone does not let me tell them how I feel in a fight. I put others feelings before mine and let people take advantage of me. 
- Self-centered


STRENGTHS

- Ambitious
- Hard-working
- Kind
- Caring
- Loving
- Intelligent
- Humorous
- Positive/ Negative
- Resilient
- Creative
- Proud
- Determined













Persuasive Essay - Final Draft

In addressing the issue of Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adoption, better known as LGBT adoption, one must recognize the importance of the “best interests of the child” standard. This moral idea simply states that the decisions the court makes regarding a child’s placement must directly reflect what would be best for the adolescent. So, do same-sex couples lack the skills to successfully raise a family? To date, all research in the area of LGBT adoption has come to the same conclusion: Children of LGBT parents grow up just as successful as those of heterosexual parents, and are no less happy and well-adjusted. This justifies the conjecture that it is not in the best interests of the child to disallow LGBT adoption.


Many argue that all youth should have a male as well as a female role model to guide them through the process of growing up. Though this argument is valid, it is not only the parents of an adolescent who influence their behavior. Descendants of single parents are able to find positive male and female role models within their society and social environment. This is the same, and should be considered the same, for children of LGBT parents. “Good parenting” is not influenced by the orientation of the couple, but rather by the parents’ ability to create a loving, supportive home – an ability that does not rely on whether a parent is gay or straight. LGBT couples have the same capability to mold a minor into an upstanding, successful, intelligent citizen, as straight couples.

A common misconception regarding LGBT adoption is that the child will become homosexual. It has been proven that this statement is false. Many children of heterosexual parents have also been known to become homosexual. The sexuality of the adolescent is not determined by the sexuality of the parents. It is also believed that a child of LGBT parents may be hassled based on the sexual preference of their parents. One will be teased, picked on, and socially stigmatized at some point in time and all of this will be experienced for other reasons. Children of both homosexual and heterosexual parents are going to experience some sort of persecution and the acceptance of a child in to mainstream society is irrelevant of whether the parents are straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.

All people, whether they are heterosexual or not, have the right to adopt. The suitability of a parent should be based, not on the sexual orientation of the person, but on their ability to create a nurturing home from which the child can prosper. Offspring of LGBT couples will grow up to be equally as fortunate and fruitful as those of heterosexual parents. 

Persuasive Essay - LGBT Adoption

In addressing the issue of Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adoption, better known as LGBT adoption, one must recognize the importance of the “best interests of the child” standard. This moral idea simply states that the decisions the court makes regarding a child’s placement must directly reflect what would be best for the adolescent. So, do same-sex couples lack the skills to successfully raise a family? To date, all research in the area of LGBT adoption has come to the same conclusion: Children of LGBT parents grow up just as successful as those of heterosexual parents, and are no less happy and well-adjusted. This justifies the conjecture that it is not in the best interests of the child to disallow LGBT adoption.


Many argue that all youth should have a male as well as a female role model to guide them through the process of growing up. Though this argument is valid, it is not only the parents of an adolescent who influence their behavior. Society and the social environment in which the child is raised have an effect as well. Descendants of single parents are able to find positive male and female role models within their family members and friends. This is the same, and should be considered the same, for children of LGBT parents. “Good parenting” is not influenced by the orientation of the couple, but rather by the parents’ ability to create a loving, supportive home – an ability that does not rely on whether a parent is gay or straight. LGBT couples have the same capability to mold a minor into an upstanding, successful, intelligent citizen, as straight couples.

A common misconception regarding LGBT adoption is that the child will become homosexual. It has been proven that this statement is false. Many children of heterosexual parents have also been known to become homosexual. The sexuality of the adolescent is not determined by the sexuality of the parents. It is also believed that a child of LGBT parents may be hassled based on the sexual preference of their parents. One will be teased, picked on, and socially stigmatized at some point in time and all of this will be experienced for other reasons. It is quite probable for youth to be bullied for physical incentives such as being overweight or looking different. Children of both homosexual and heterosexual parents are going to experience some sort of persecution and the acceptance of a child in to mainstream society is irrelevant of whether the parents are straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.

All people, whether they are heterosexual or not, have the right to adopt. The suitability of a parent should be based, not on the sexual orientation of the person, but on their ability to create a nurturing home from which the child can prosper. Offspring of LGBT couples will grow up to be equally as fortunate and fruitful as those of heterosexual parents.